GRE Argument Essay Sample Prompt. In surveys, Mason Town people rank water sports activities (swimming, boating and fishing) amongst their preferred recreational routines.

The Mason River flowing as a result of the city is seldom used for these pursuits, nonetheless, and the metropolis park division devotes minimal of its price range to sustaining riverside recreational amenities. For yrs there have been complaints from residents about the high quality of the river’s water and the river’s scent. In reaction, the condition has lately declared strategies to clear up Mason River. Use of the river for drinking water sports activities is as a result guaranteed to improve.

The town govt should for that explanation commit more funds in this year’s spending plan to riverside recreational facilities. Write a response in which you analyze the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be guaranteed to reveal how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

  • Just what are the moves for conducting a complete peer post on an essay?
  • How can i have a academic and formal firmness within my essays?
  • How do i comfortably refute opposite points of views with my convincing essay?
  • What’s the entire process to find scholarly articles and journals for scientific studies-based upon essays? reddit Sample GRE Argument Essay. rn[Restatement of the supplied argument] In the argument furnished, the creator asserts that the Mason City governing administration should to dedicate much more cash to riverside leisure amenities.

[Your thesis] The author’s argument does not make a cogent scenario for amplified means primarily based on river use. [Overview of good reasons relevant to target] This argument is rife with holes and assumptions, and thus, not powerful plenty of to lead to greater funding. rn[Initial motive] Citing surveys of city citizens, the author reports metropolis resident’s enjoy of h2o sports activities. It is not very clear, on the other hand, the scope and validity of that survey. [Instance] For case in point, the study could have requested residents if they want working with the river for h2o sports or would like to see a hydroelectric dam crafted, which might have swayed citizens toward river sports activities.

[Rationalization] The sample might not have been agent of city citizens, asking only those people inhabitants who dwell on the river. The survey might have been 10 internet pages extensive, with 2 concerns committed to river sports activities.

We just do not know. [Link] Unless of course the study is fully consultant, valid, and reliable, it can not be employed to correctly back the author’s argument. rn[Next rationale] Additionally, the creator indicates that inhabitants do not use the river for swimming, boating, and fishing, regardless of their professed desire, simply because the water is polluted and smelly. [Explanation] Whilst a polluted, smelly river would possible lower down on river sporting activities, a concrete connection concerning the resident’s absence of river use and the river’s present-day point out is not effectively designed.

While there have been problems, we do not know if there have been numerous complaints from a wide variety of individuals, or potentially from 1 or two individuals who made several issues. [Backlink] To reinforce his/her argument, the author would advantage from employing a normed study asking a wide assortment of residents why they do not at this time use the river. rn[Third cause] Developing upon the implication that residents do not use the river because of to the good quality of the river’s water and the odor, the author suggests that a river clean up will final result in greater river utilization. If the river’s water good quality and smell final result from problems which can be cleaned, this might be correct.